Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Double secret big brother ...


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 846
Date:
Double secret big brother ...
Permalink Closed


What do you all think of the revelation that the FBI is keeping tabs on the ACLU and other law abiding organizations?

Does this seem a little over the top to you?

I can understand surveilance on organizations that break the law. Or are anti-American, but the ACLU is neither.

Greenpeace, can at times be questionable - they do like to employ environmental terrorism.

But the ACLU?

__________________
- Scott Leffler - Host and Moderator


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 410
Date:
Permalink Closed

"Greenpeace, can at times be questionable - they do like to employ environmental terrorism."


Could you please explain this with a bit more detail. I know they are a radical group, but how do they employ environmental terrorism?



__________________
Do not go where the path may lead - Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail: Emerson


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 846
Date:
Permalink Closed


shughes wrote:

Could you please explain this with a bit more detail. I know they are a radical group, but how do they employ environmental terrorism?



Maybe it wasn't the best choice of words, but how would you describe some of their tactics ... examples:

Land Rover incident

BLM arrests

UK incident

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

While I support their goals, the ends DO NOT always justify the means. I've also heard of numerous occasions where Greenpeace defaces public and or private property ... and vandalizes equipment that was meant to be used to do logging projects the group opposed.

Thus, my declaring them "environmental terrorists." Again, maybe a poor choice of words. But my point was that they sometimes operate outside the law and so I could see why the FBI would watch them ... whereas, I've never heard any instance of the ACLU doing any of this type stuff.

__________________
- Scott Leffler - Host and Moderator
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink Closed

How about bullies or extremists, in this day and age terrorism has a whole new meaning.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink Closed

If you hurt people,animals,public and or private property,then you are a terrorist,


Anyone that causes fear is wrong



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 673
Date:
Permalink Closed

Hold on, pardner. That seems waaaaaaay too general a definition for something as serious as terrorism. My friend is terrified of doctors, does that make them terrorists? Are pit-bulls terrorists? How about Dracula? The meaning of terrorist has not changed, it's just your government trying to expand the meaning to justify their facist agenda. Thank you, but one GWB is enough.


"Environmental terrorism" has always referred to the more extreme methods applied by over-zealous naturalists, also known as 'eco-warriors.' They drive spikes into trees to destroy the chain saws. They sabotage equipment by pouring sand in the crankcases. They blow up dams. They create natural roadblocks, set traps & snares, even handcuff themselves to treetops scheduled to be cut down. They protect one thing by endangering another.



__________________
Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. That way, when you DO criticize them, you are a mile away, and you have their shoes... If you choose any truth and follow it blindly, it becomes a falsehood, and you, a fanatic.


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 408
Date:
Permalink Closed

since when is the aclu a law abiding group ?   news to me .

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 145
Date:
Permalink Closed

Dracula scares me.


I don't consider him a terrorist but I think the government should still keep tabs on him.


He sucks peoples blood for God's sake.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink Closed

Scott Leffler wrote:


What do you all think of the revelation that the FBI is keeping tabs on the ACLU and other law abiding organizations? Does this seem a little over the top to you? I can understand surveilance on organizations that break the law. Or are anti-American, but the ACLU is neither. Greenpeace, can at times be questionable - they do like to employ environmental terrorism. But the ACLU?


The history between the ACLU and FBI is interesting. The ACLU has secretly collaborated with the FBI at times, once voluntarily turning over its own membership list. Read Gentry's book "J. Edgar Hoover: the Man and the Secrets".


When you look at the FBI's history, you realize why Eleanor Roosevelt once publicly called them "The American Gestapo". Forget the mafia, the FBI is the single longest-lived, pervasive organized crime syndicate in the history of the country. The list of private citizens they have ruined in the course of their 70+ years of existence is stunning.


Just to give you a couple of examples, the FBI used to keep track of the freedom riders during the Civil Rights bus rides of the '60's. They'd phone ahead to the local Klan, who would meet the buses and systematically beat the hell out of anyone who got off. The hate mail they generated and sent to Martin Luther King is legendary. Their express purpose, as revealed in memos of the time, was to drive him to suicide.


Hoover had dope on every president from Roosevelt to Nixon. It got to be hilarious. A new president would summon Hoover to the White House to fire him. Hoover would emerge two hours later with the president announcing that Hoover was graciously staying on for another four years.


For example, Hoover had extensive tapes of JFK having sex with his girlfriend during WWII. Not much of a problem, except the girlfriend turned out to have been a Nazi spy. How would that have gone over during the 1960 campaign? That kept Bobby Kennedy, who hated Hoover (the feelings were mutual) in line for an entire decade.


The illegal burglaries, phone-tapping, mail-opening, smear campaigns, hate mail, harassment, false arrests, evidence tampering and on and on and on that the FBI has perpetrated against labor unions, political activists and just average citizens over the course of the last century makes it ill-suited to watch over our country's security.


Jim Hufnagel


 


 


 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink Closed

Nitrogen_Widget wrote:


Dracula scares me. I don't consider him a terrorist but I think the government should still keep tabs on him. He sucks peoples blood for God's sake.

Hey, so does mindcrime! Everyone watch out!

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 77
Date:
Permalink Closed

So who keeps the file on the FBI? The ACLU may be vocal, but that doesn't make them terrorists. The good they do for the every day people far outweighs the negativity press they get. How many times a day do you think they make one phone call on someone's behalf, that stops government bullying?


Anonymous don't be concerned about MC. If they really are a vampire, they only come out after dark. Just stay near the streetlights and you'll be fine. But MC you are justly afraid, he wants your title as king.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
Permalink Closed

So much is considered secret or priviledged information in our government that there is no way to watchdog any of it. The CIA, FBI, NSA, CID, all these alphabet souper powers are acting in such coveted secrecy, they don't even know what they themselves are doing most of the time. I remember a story not too long ago about how three FBI agents were killed when a separate team of agents burst in and opened fire on each other. 2 groups from the same agency, both working undercover, wound up shooting themselves to death. It's pathetic


SETEC Astronomy


Phantom 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard