Forgottenchilds useless information:

jspeer · Guru

RE: RE: Forgottenchilds useless information:

jspeer · Guru

1. If you get elected tuesday, will you be walking to the out of town conventions. This could save the district a lot of money!
You mean the job doesn't come with a chauffeur? LOL!

alwayswatching · Guru

-- Edited by alwayswatching at 10:25, 2005-06-10

alwayswatching · Guru

-- Edited by alwayswatching at 10:25, 2005-06-10

Dovey · Senior Member

I had to work today people you could have waited for me........sorry AW...you mayor...ok got my vote........am i allowed to sing on this one

Dovey · Senior Member

Ok how come i can not edit my posts?????????????????????

Nukedlou · Veteran Member

Quicherbichin! Who is Jim H? Wow I join a site and get attacked......what kind of welcome party are you people? For saying your public officials and care about what happens to others, you sure are treating me like a leper. What a bunch of good christians you people are....... or is that just on Sundays at church. People like you are what is wrong with this country. It's like those psychos that believe that abortion is so wrong and the fetus is a living human, so they kill a doctor who by their own definition is a human. Do you see the irony? I have never met Mr. H but see he has done no wrong to me. And I'm sure that if elected, his faults are no worse than FC's or any of yours. At least Mr. H posted who he was. And if your wondering, my real name is Lou Ballickski and I live in middleport. I've lived here my whole life. I also read a lot of your posts. What a bunch of uneducated cry babies. I can just picture what you people look like. Don't you people work? Or are you posting at work? AW, what office do you hold? It must not be too important. Seems like your always on this website. If I elected you I would expect results and if I read how childish you are I would make it my goal to support anyone who wants to knock you out of office. And yes AW, I will find out who you are. I still think you are Julie Maedl.

Dovey · Senior Member

Who ever you maybe DO NOT EVER talk to a lady that way.TREATING women that way shows what kind of guy you are.

NuclearLou · Senior Member

"And if your wondering, my real name is Ballickski and I live in middleport."

Salty and musty aren't they?

All Ball-lickski's must wash your tongue please before returning to work.

Hey Jim, got a hold of a Human Resources program that is used to test candidates for employment (funny you mentioned that). The program can identify the writers educational level and make associations writing styles-to-writing style. Understand? By entering three sentences from a known source, a simple comparison is made in seconds...guess what...you're Jim H. And you are not school board material.

Dovey · Senior Member

.....

-- Edited by Dovey at 07:25, 2005-06-14

Date: Sat May 14 6:19 PM, 2005

quote:

Hey Jim, got a hold of a Human Resources program that is used to test candidates for employment (funny you mentioned that). The program can identify the writers educational level and make associations writing styles-to-writing style. Understand? By entering three sentences from a known source, a simple comparison is made in seconds...guess what...you're Jim H. And you are not school board material."

Lou, get a refund on your pseudo-science computer program. So far it has been jumping to conclusions almost as desperately as you have. Perhaps you should do a test of your programs reliability. Maybe you ought to run all of your own identities through it to see if it can still recognize you in spite of all your so subtly different styles of sarcastic egomania. Only problem is that this would require at least the pretense of open-minded, scientific discovery - which is a process you always skip past in formulating your never-let-the-facts-stop-me activist agenda.

NuclearLou · Senior Member

O.K., Anonymous, I'll bite--Like what information has been "jumped to" with regard to my research or activism? Name one item that hasn't been proven correct?

Date: Sat May 14 6:48 PM, 2005

...Although... in a rare case of finding ANYTHING to agree with Lou about - it certainly smells like the same gent. But, really... it doesn't take a program to recognize the bitter and limited, intellectual grasp of this particular avowed Christian hater.

NuclearLou · Senior Member

And here's a message for Mr. Ballicker or Nooked...

I'm assuming that you're a male, and I'm assuming that the others are women--and, If I am also reading the message correctly that you left ("I'll find out who you are")--then the ladies might feel like you are threatening or trying to intimidate them. (Ladies?) If so, I will track you down like an animal and drag your screeming self right to the authorities. Is that so very clear?

How's that ladies. DV-See if MotM wants to come to an election along the lake Tuesday night, would ya?

LR

Here's a message for Anonymous--In an earlier post, and really, throughout all of your weaving diatribes, you have alternately stated that you are, or that you are not one or the other of the anonymouses'... (is that meeces?)

Would you mind simply answering just one question? Which particular "anonymous" post will you claim to have written and submitted as your first post? You see, the reason I ask this, is that you have stated little confidence in the HR program, and if you provide your first post to me, I can run it against other writing to see which ones you actually posted. That is, since we have so many anonymous posters, and, any one of them could claim or deny any particular post, thereby really causing confusion to the reader.

Perhaps you would willingly list the posts YOU have made? No names, just which ones.

Play ball?

NuclearLou · Senior Member

Thanks Paul. That was good enough.

NuclearLou · Senior Member

RE: Forgottenchilds useless information:

O.K., I'll bite--Like what information has been "jumped to" with regard to my research or activism? Name one item that hasn't been proven correct?

I'm waiting...

Dovey · Senior Member

.....

-- Edited by Dovey at 08:03, 2005-06-13

NuclearLou · Senior Member

No, not a hero DV, just sick of spineless wonders throwing their weight-(lessness) around.

Where's the moderator in all of this and what happened to "family values"?

And, why can't we edit anymore? What's the deal with that? Scott?

Date: Sat May 14 7:22 PM, 2005

quote:
Originally posted by: NuclearLou
"O.K., Anonymous, I'll bite--Like what information has been "jumped to" with regard to my research or activism? Name one item that hasn't been proven correct?"

I generally am not so mean - and want to spare you the embarrassment of posting the web links in front of your faithful. If you want me to, just say so. The durability of information on the web and Google is a powerful thing. When you enjoy being a provocateur you tend to cross paths with the truly credentialed, the more knowledgeable and the more rational.

There are real problems to address with some of these issues and I came to this forum to find out more. What I found is someone who would rather turn it into a circus act. You make progress in these issues much harder by purposely courting and reveling in the severe polarization you create with you self-centeredness and ego.

Who and what groups are you allied with? Will any recognized scientific organization or environmental group stand with you? Have you alienated all of them? That doesn't sound helpful or productive somehow.

Your need to find out whom people are, track them down like dogs, and to actually purchase software to help in the process is the reason I will not give you a target. You are so entrenched in the perceived absolutes of your agenda that you are generally, quickly rude and crass without provocation - and it seams that your temper could be dangerous.

Dovey · Senior Member

the vote is out.

-- Edited by Dovey at 08:04, 2005-06-13

NuclearLou · Senior Member

Spit out the bait, eh?

I have science on my side. I truly do. Who they are, you'll just have to wait and see. Unfortuantely, you still have not answered the question(s) about which posts are yours. Why's that?

As far as embarassing me--fat chance. If you have scientific people that don't agree with me, then the only one's I've ever crossed paths with in disagreement were the scientists in the weapons labs and a few others with pro-nuclear agendas...including some big European players. If you wish, go a head and try to embarass me in front of "my followers." LOL.

I relish the opportunity. Since you may be going to a lot of trouble tracking downs quotes from these people, would you mind, before you post, answer the question asked of you. That's not asking much to give you this chance at discrediting me.

I've never stood for press photos on the back of anyone else's research. You, on the other hand, are believed to have done this... Actually, I've never stood for press photos for any of this...oops, I take that back...My face was used on the cover of Artvoice a couple of times against my wish and without my prior knowledge...but it was still MY research. I did submit a passport type image for a recent biography. Does that count?

Why would I give my research information to you? You are anonymous? That just doesn't make sense on any level no matter how you try and slice it. Who are you and what would you do with it...would be the question ANYone would want to know that. Besides, you can continue to listen to the global satellite radio broadcasts and get lots of information. Thanks for listening.

Hey AW, wanna give some of YOUR info to a stranger? LOL!

NuclearLou · Senior Member

"and it seams that your temper could be dangerous."

Only to those afraid of the authorities. Or, to those that wish to hurt the less able.

NuclearLou · Senior Member

COMMENTS INTERJECTED

RE: Forgottenchilds useless information:
quote: Originally posted by: NuclearLou
"O.K., Anonymous, I'll bite--Like what information has been "jumped to" with regard to my research or activism? Name one item that hasn't been proven correct?"

------------------------

I generally am not so mean - and want to spare you the embarrassment of posting the web links in front of your faithful. If you want me to, just say so. The durability of information on the web and Google is a powerful thing. When you enjoy being a provocateur you tend to cross paths with the truly credentialed, the more knowledgeable and the more rational.

{See my previous allowance]

There are real problems to address with some of these issues and I came to this forum to find out more. What I found is someone who would rather turn it into a circus act. You make progress in these issues much harder by purposely courting and reveling in the severe polarization you create with you self-centeredness and ego.

[IF you came here looking for answers--then where's your first legitmate question?}

Lou-ettes--"Looking for love in all the wrong places." This is a radio station/DJ Web site...Sierra Club is over there.

Who and what groups are you allied with? Will any recognized scientific organization or environmental group stand with you? Have you alienated all of them? That doesn't sound helpful or productive somehow.

[IF that sounds-the word is- counterproductive to you then the voice is in your head.]

[YEP, scientists, I got em...who they are you don't get to know, sorry--you have no stated reason to have this info, except that you feel you have some sort of "right" to question me anonymously...Sure LOL!]

Your need to find out whom people are, track them down like dogs, and to actually purchase software to help in the process is the reason I will not give you a target.

[NOPE--that was first said by Nukedlou and not me--see, you're confusing the two...what I said was that I'd defend the womenfolk. Understand?]

You are so entrenched in the perceived absolutes of your agenda that you are generally, quickly rude and crass without provocation - and it seams that your temper could be dangerous.

[I am sorry for being crude to someone who doesn't want to be known but wants things from others...Oh, and someone who begins posting with what words were those again?...let us know which posts are yours would ya?] [Be happy to point out "provocation" in individual posts if you would let us know which are yours...IF there was no perception of crass first, no crass or crude comes back--that's usually the rule.]

Please and thanks,

Lou R

alwayswatching · Guru

-- Edited by alwayswatching at 10:23, 2005-06-10

Date: Sat May 14 8:06 PM, 2005

Go back and take a look at your discussions with Radsafe Lou. Once again, I would hate to post their lessons to you. Are these not people from all over the world with lifetimes in the field and with solid credentials. Most could not be contained at openly mocking your assumptions, your lack of understanding in the discipline, the overt fear mongering in the wording of your postings and the agenda that you went looking to prop up instead of dealing with actual science. You deal in hearsay and gross exaggerations in your radio interviews.

You have told everyone that perhaps exposure to the mist of Niagara could be dangerous to perhaps kids and pregnant women. Show us the science to back up this assumption. We need to perhaps test the Maid boat captains down there and treat them if this is true given their lifetimes of exposure. Did you test the water as the interviewer suggested? Or could the truth take some fear out of your cause?

Who is standing with you Lou?