Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Buried Secrets--LOOW Ordnance site and schools or, Pu & You


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 469
Date:
Buried Secrets--LOOW Ordnance site and schools or, Pu & You
Permalink Closed


A NIAGARA GAZETTE SPECIAL SERIES--BURIED SECRETS


http://www.niagara-gazette.com/story.asp?id=2395


What lies beneath
By Rick Forgione and Aaron Besecker
Sunday, July 24, 2005

Almost 3,000 students and adults walk the halls on any given school day in the Lewiston-Porter Central School District on Creek Road.

Less than a mile away sits the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works — one of the most notorious radioactive sites in the country’s history — holding remnants and reminders of the federal government’s atomic weapons.

Farther down the road sits Chemical Waste Management, home to the Northeast’s only hazardous waste storage site.

The proximity to these two sites — and the fear that one accident could prove deadly — is what prompted a group of graduate students and professionals from the University at Buffalo to recommend the school district be moved.

It’s a suggestion that not only has been ignored, but apparently remains unknown to many local and state leaders and Lew-Port school officials.

“It’s very unlikely that I would forget hearing something like that,” said Ed Lilly, who is in his ninth year on the Board of Education.

The school district sits on a 420-acre site off of Creek Road split between the towns of Porter and Lewiston. The property is notoriously known as the buffer zone of LOOW, a site of federal government activity during the 1940s, including the storage of radioactive waste.

Several tests searching for contamination have been conducted on the campus over the last several years. School officials insist students and staff aren’t in danger of becoming sick.

That stance contradicts the “Towards a Smart Growth Comprehensive Plan: Assessment and Recommendations for the Town of Porter” completed by the UB group in 2002. The project’s goal was to develop a list of recommendations of areas Porter can improve upon, such as tourism, waterfront access and economic development.

Under a recommendation labeled “CWM should be encouraged to utilize best management practices,” the group points out the threat the company and LOOW site pose on the school district.

“The Lewiston-Porter school ... must be relocated, because its location and the possible threats that it poses to the students that attend this school,” according to the group’s award-winning report. “Immediate action should be taken concerning the Lewiston-Porter campus. We recommend the relocation of the school.”

Town of Porter officials didn’t take the group’s warning too seriously.

Bernie Carreno, co-chair of the current Porter Master Plan Committee, said the group had no facts to backup the statement.

“In this case, I think they just went off the deep end,” Carreno said. As college students, they saw CWM as a hot issue that was basically thrown in without much consultation, he said.

The group, members of the Department of Urban and Regional Planning under the guidance of Dr. Ute Lehrer, received several accolades for its Porter report, such as the “Best Student Project Award” from the Western New York section of the American Planning Association; “Outstanding Student Project” by the New York Upstate Chapter of the American Planning Association; and “Best Example of the Planning Process” from the American Institute for Certified Planners Student Project Award.

Officials from the Town of Porter used portions of the report to compile its master plan in 2004. The recommendations to move the school district were not carried over.

“They took it upon themselves not to follow this award-winning study,” said local researcher Lou Ricciuti, adding he believes school officials also were fully informed. “Both of them set the recommendation aside.”

Porter Councilman William Choboy, who has been out front during the town’s Master Plan process, said the town wasn’t obligated to accept all of the group’s recommendations. He pointed out the group was not “really a consultant in the normal sense.”

Choboy stressed it was a semester-long project, and that overall the group did a very good job on the Master Plan. The recommendation about moving the schools, however, came from students who were surprised at the existence of waste at CWM and the waste from the LOOW.

“It wasn’t grounded in any research that had been done,” Choboy said, adding that Lehrer called CWM “the big white elephant in the parlor.”

Pat Lynch, the other co-chair of the Master Plan Committee, said she needed to see facts and results from environmental testing before backing a recommendation to move the campus.

“It would be irresponsible for us as a committee to make any decisions at this point,” she said, adding the Master Plan committee is pursuing a more “scientific perspective” on the whole situation, Lynch added.

Even state leaders, like State Sen. George Maziarz, weren’t let in on the group’s warnings to move the school campus. He would, however, like to review them and have Department of Health officials review the information as well.

When asked why the report wouldn’t have crossed his desk, Maziarz responded, “I have no idea.”

Town of Porter Supervisor Merton Wiepert reiterated the point that the recommendation had no data to back it up.

“That’s nothing to do with our Master Plan whatsoever in my opinion,” Wiepert said. “(The schools are) in a different town. Why would that be part of our Master Plan?”

A representative from the school district attended preliminary Master Plan Committee meetings, but that was the extent of their participation, Wiepert said.

Some Lew-Port school officials are baffled about why they were never properly alerted to the report’s findings.

“It never surfaced at the board level,” said Jim Leighton, who was school board president at the time the report was completed. “I don’t know why, I’m quite serious.”

That doesn’t mean the existence of the report was never mentioned, Leighton added, pointing out the school board gets 50 informational packets a year. “I can’t recall, but we may have gotten something that said a report was available in Porter, but it wasn’t anything specific.”

This also isn’t the first time Leighton has heard about possibly moving the schools. In fact, two years ago, while he was still on the board, he and School Superintendent Whitney Vantine discussed relocating the campus to Joseph Davis State Park due to public pressure regarding the environmental concerns.

The district wanted to use the upcoming relicensing of the New York Power Authority to receive enough money to pay for the move. Leighton left the school board a few months later after not being re-elected and discussions seemed to drop off.

“I think it ended up being too grandiose a plan,” Leighton said.

Assistant Superintendent Don Rappold also denies any knowledge of the Porter study. He added the idea of relocating to Joseph Davis was to take advantage of some greenway money through the Power Authority’s relicensing settlement with local school districts and governments. That idea no longer is being tossed around, he added.

“In my mind, it was never because of health concerns,” Rappold said.

While there’s no plans to relocate, Lew-Port officials have spent nearly $50,000 over the past two years searching for contamination on the campus. Last year, a level of arsenic was detected behind the Community Resource Center on the north end, believed to be from the spraying of an old orchard located decades ago at the site.

Pan-American Environmental of Buffalo has recently completed a testing study about the arsenic and the school board is awaiting additional recommendations about possible remediation work on site.

“There have been so many studies and so much information since 1980 that it’s difficult to know what is factual or not,” Lilly said. “The unanswered question now is, what to do about the results of testing? I don’t think anybody knows.”

Contact Rick Forgione at (716) 282-2311, Ext. 2257 or Aaron Besecker at Ext. 2263

--------------------------------


Niagara Gazette BURIED SECRETS special series


http://www.niagara-gazette.com/story.asp?id=2396
Life as a wasteland

By Aaron Besecker
Sunday, July 24, 2005

LEWISTON-PORTER — They called it the perfect spot.

When the federal government wanted to bury radioactive waste from the atomic bomb after the second World War, everything seemed right about a rural spot in northwest Niagara County.

The Lake Ontario Ordnance Works, in the towns of Lewiston and Porter, once sat on open farmland far from the bustle of an urban populous.

The LOOW site, which the government had already used for short-lived production of explosives for the war, sat atop a thick layer of clay and silt.

Here, the composition of the Earth’s crust represented a geological blessing — a mostly impermeable mass just beneath the surface meant to secure everything above from the precious groundwater below.

But today, many residents and officials are concerned about chemical and radiological contamination and the chances they could be causing long-term health problems for people in the area.

They hope what was buried didn’t get out.

And a problem exists for those investigating the situation today — they might never know the whole story.

The place for waste

“It just seemed like an ideal place to put radiation,” said Sean Q. Kelly, with his feet up on his desk inside his office in Niagara University’s Timon Hall.

Kelly, an NU political science professor and head of the Environmental Learning Institute, chairs the LOOW Restoration Advisory Board, a public body of citizens and local officials whose mission is to follow and direct cleanup efforts at the LOOW.

“In the 1940s, that was the boonies out there,” Kelly said.

More than 60 years later, the public’s proximity to the site by way of possible health effects is a lot closer than some like.

And even for those attempting to uncover the truth, the quest for information has been a challenge.

Just ask NU professor of history Andrew Jenks.

Jenks, now doing research for an upcoming book on American technological utopianism and its connection to Model City, where CWM now sits, has combed through documents accessible from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Jenks, while hailing the Army Corps’ cleanup efforts, believes no one knows for sure what records of the site have been lost or destroyed.

“That’s what we’ll never know,” Jenks said.

Here are some bits and pieces that are known about the site:

n The U.S. Department of Energy cleaned up areas of the LOOW known as “Vicinity Properties” in the early 1980s. All but three of the properties — E, E’ and G — were declared completed remediated and clear of radiological concern. Small, inaccessible portions of these three properties did not allow for total study of the areas.

n The U.S. Army Corps found concentrations of plutonium and strontium in May and September, 2002, while searching for buried waste from University of Rochester experiments on Vicinity Property G. No documentation was available about any radioactive wastes containing those two elements were buried there.

n An earlier excavation of the U of R site in 972 by the Department of Energy removed 512 cubic yards of soil, drums and debris. The on-site destination of the material was unknown, according to the Army Corps.

n The search for the U of R waste involved the digging of several ditches on the site. A small mammal bone as well as some laboratory debris and soil with radiological contamination were found. The radioactive soil was initially not detectable at the surface, according to the Army Corps.

n Officials were alerted to possible radiological contamination of waterways as early as 1949. A Department of the Interior report, uncovered by NU’s Jenks, reveals officials urged investigation of possible radiological contamination of a drainage pathway. The area known as the Central Drainage Ditch, which eventually flows into Four Mile Creek and out to Lake Ontario, sat within 100 feet of the waste disposal area at the LOOW and could have received radioactive liquids. The report recommended semi-annual radioactive analyses.

n According to more documents uncovered by Jenks, a contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy intentionally dumped 770,000 gallons of contaminated construction water into the Central Drainage Ditch from 9:30 a.m. on Veteran’s Day, 1982 until 4:30 p.m. on Nov. 17. The move violated New York State Department of Environmental Conservation regulations, and was done to avoid a potentially major overflow from retention ponds thanks to rainstorms, officials said.

Picking up the pieces

While some information on the LOOW may be scattered or incomplete, opinions differ on what conclusions should be drawn from them.

The NU professors acknowledge a significant problem in the past, but believe things have gone better lately.

“This isn’t a Chernobyl,” said Jenks, referring to the 1986 nuclear accident in the former Soviet Union that is considered to have caused around 2,500 deaths and massive environmental destruction.

The situation at LOOW was bad up until the 1970s. Since then, many of the problems have been dealt with reasonably.

Fellow NU professor Kelly agrees.

In terms of threat to the public, the most immediate threats have been taken care of, he said.

“It’s better than it was,” Kelly said.

Problem sticking around

Amy Witryol is co-founder of the Niagara Health Science Report, a group pushing for cleanup at the LOOW.

For her, the lack of readily available information and current operations on the site equal definite problems.

“We’ve got an unquantified risk,” Witryol said.

If we want to have Lewiston and Porter around by the end of this century, locals and officials have to address the waste problem soon or likely face a troubling future, Witryol said.

“Eventually, we’ll have no town,” she said.

Witryol pointed to the fact that radioactive waste brought to the LOOW site is now unaccounted for.

Another critic of just how the LOOW was handled is a Niagara Falls native and researcher, Lou Ricciuti, who believes there are many failures with regards to the LOOW site historically.

“There has been a woeful lack of communication with the public about that site since day one,” Ricciuti said.

Through communication with locals who used to live near the site, as well as internationally known health experts, Ricciuti has spent the past five years trying to put together pieces of the puzzle.

What still bewilders him is the stunning lack of publicly available information.

“There should be records out the wazoo,” Ricciuti said.

Records or not, a lot of work has been done at the site, Kelly said. And although the public perception may not be exact, he warned against drawing any conclusions about what may be lingering dangers.

The question of whether any radiation may be moved around below the ground — possibly by and into the ground water — is a “bigger question” than whether any of the radiation may be moved in other ways.

“It’s not a problem that’s solved by any means,” Kelly said.

Contact Aaron Besecker at (716) 282-2311, Ext. 2263



-- Edited by NuclearLou at 23:54, 2005-07-25

__________________
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all." Helen Keller "...and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us..."


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 469
Date:
RE: LOOW Ordnance site and schools, or, Pu & You
Permalink Closed


BURIED SECRETS from the Niagara Gazette DAY TWO


Niagara has long history of environmental missteps


http://www.niagara-gazette.com/print_story.asp?id=2403


By Aaron Besecker
Monday, July 25, 2005

Tales of swamp monsters and strangely glowing animals living around the land of the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works were commonplace when Paul Gromosiak was growing up.

As a child, he and his friends often ventured across the landscape not knowing what was buried under their feet.

“It was the thing to do,” Gromosiak said.

The Niagara Falls historian wishes he knew then what he knows now.

And what he does know — not only about the LOOW but the region’s legacy of environmental pollution — isn’t a pretty picture.

The giant in the story is the Manhattan Project wastes buried at the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works in the 1940s. They contain materials and residue from the making of the atomic bomb.

“Those monsters are here forever,” Gromosiak said.

The first monsters, though, came in the form of early saw mills that dumped waste right into the Niagara River in the early 19th century.

More serious wastes arrived with the advent of the chemical industry in the 1920s.

And what story about Niagara and the environment would be complete without the mention of Love Canal.

“Love Canal was an absolute tragedy,” said Sean Q. Kelly, Niagara University political science professor and chair of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Restoration Advisory Board.

The fact that people were hurt and the government resisted and denied what was going on only made things worse, Kelly said.

The current process is much more open, and the government climate has changed since the 1970s, according to Kelly.

He suspects many people who moved out of Niagara Falls because of Love Canal might have ended up in Lewiston and Youngstown — the areas now in the LOOW line of fire.


Still, the name ‘Love Canal’ serves as an eye-opener, even today.

“That really awakened everyone to the problems,” Gromosiak said.

Two of Gromosiak’s uncles worked at Hooker Chemical, the company that dumped chemicals with known carcinogens into four contaminated sites.

Unfortunately, those relatives didn’t really think about what the odors they smelled at work might be doing to them, he said.

“Ignorance was not bliss at Niagara Falls,” Gromosiak said. “It was dangerous. It was deadly.”

Contact Aaron Besecker at (716) 282-2311, Ext. 2263.


©2004 The Kokomo Tribune
-------------------------------------------------------


Lew-Port, LOOW are talk of the town


http://www.niagara-gazette.com/print_story.asp?id=2403


By Rick Forgione and Aaron Besecker
Monday, July 25, 2005

LEWISTON — Charlene Lopacki used to laugh every time her father told one of his tall tales about spotting a giant rabbit or a squirrel with two tails while he was hunting near the former Lake Ontario Ordinance Works site off of Creek Road.

Now she wonders if her father really was exaggerating.

“There’s been so many reports of people becoming sick and dying because of what’s buried there, it’s hard to ignore,” she said.

As a student at Lewiston-Porter 10 years ago, Lopacki never worried about whether chemicals were located behind the school buildings, which sit on the buffer zone of LOOW. She and her classmates used to spend time in the back woods along a roped playground course. She even recalls climbing on a few green barrels from time to time.

“We didn’t know about any dangers back then,” she said, “but it makes me really nervous for the teachers and kids now.”

Thirty years ago, former Youngstown resident John Soltys used to hunt on land that was part of the LOOW site. He often found the land in a state of disrepair, with gates and fences knocked down allowing anyone to just walk right in. Now, Soltys said, there needs to be an investigation done independently of the government.

“It never got the public attention it should’ve got,” Soltys said.

Lewiston resident Karl Terryberry thinks the situation is well worth investigating, but it’s too soon to be calling for any drastic action like some locals have been.

“They’re out of their minds,” said Terryberry, who moved to North Carolina after school but then came back to the area because he likes it so much. “Ignorance is really dangerous in a situation like this.”

“Until all the facts are in, I’m not going to worry about it,” he later said.

Porter resident Phyllis Hastings agreed. She lived on Porter Center Road and attended Lew-Port for her entire school career. She, along with her two siblings and three children, graduated from there. She readily dismissed the health concerns.

“I’ve heard it for years, but I don’t buy into it,” Hastings said, “because I don’t know that many unhealthy people.”

Lewiston-Porter High School senior Matt Janik said the community has the right to know the truth.

“There’s probably something there,” he said. “People need to take tests, get the proper results and show the community everything they found.”

John Long, who owns 61 acres of land on the former LOOW site, now operates a walleye hatchery on the premises.

As a kid, he used to live on Balmer Road, and remembers a high incidence of cancer in residents on the nearby Parker Road. He and his friends used to take their .22-caliber guns and shoot rats on the old LOOW site in his younger days.

His farm was downwind from the dump site, but neither he nor his family ever got sick, Long said. “There’s no reason for me to suspect anything.”

Bruce Pryce graduated from Lew-Port in the mid-1970s, and remembers his neighbors dying from leukemia.

“Back then we all knew the stuff was there, but it wasn’t as publicized,” said Pryce, who used to hunt deer in the area eat his kill.

“But I’m sure it takes 30 to 40 years for that (cancer) stuff to show up,” he said.

Didi Mead had two boys attend Lew-Port. She also realizes the time it takes for comprehensive studies to be done and to connect cancer with a source.

“That, unfortunately, is very hard to prove,” Mead said.

But when she really sat down and thought about what could be happening, Mead said she had a big reality check.

As far as the continuing burden of the area taking in so much hazardous waste, enough is enough.

“I just think we’ve had our fair share,” Mead said.

Meanwhile, the years of rumors and reports of elevated levels of cancer and death have left current students wondering what’s still being kept a secret.

“I definitely think things are being covered up,” said Lewiston-Porter senior Matt Janik.

Some students, like 2005 graduate Matt Agnello, believe that the towns and school district are afraid to dig deep into the mystery because it would result in less financial contributions and gifts from companies like Chemical Waste Management.

“Companies are trying to buy them out by giving money, but we’re the ones who are paying,” Agnello said. “I definitely think the chances of me getting cancer are higher because I went to school in Lewiston-Porter.”

SAFETY:
Residents’ opinions mixed about rumors of contamination and danger from LOOW site.

BY rick forgione And Aaron Besecker

LEWISTON — Charlene Lopacki used to laugh every time her father told one of his tall tales about spotting a giant rabbit or a squirrel with two tails while he was hunting near the former Lake Ontario Ordinance Works site off of Creek Road.

Now she wonders if her father really was exaggerating.

“There’s been so many reports of people becoming sick and dying because of what’s buried there, it’s hard to ignore,” she said.

As a student at Lewiston-Porter 10 years ago, Lopacki never worried about whether chemicals were located behind the school buildings, which sit on the buffer zone of LOOW. She and her classmates used to spend time in the back woods along a roped playground course. She even recalls climbing on a few green barrels from time to time.

“We didn’t know about any dangers back then,” she said, “but it makes me really nervous for the teachers and kids now.”

Thirty years ago, former Youngstown resident John Soltys used to hunt on land that was part of the LOOW site. He often found the land in a state of disrepair, with gates and fences knocked down allowing anyone to just walk right in. Now, Soltys said, there needs to be an investigation done independently of the government.

“It never got the public attention it should’ve got,” Soltys said.

Lewiston resident Karl Terryberry thinks the situation is well worth investigating, but it’s too soon to be calling for any drastic action like some locals have been.

“They’re out of their minds,” said Terryberry, who moved to North Carolina after school but then came back to the area because he likes it so much. “Ignorance is really dangerous in a situation like this.”

“Until all the facts are in, I’m not going to worry about it,” he later said.

Porter resident Phyllis Hastings agreed. She lived on Porter Center Road and attended Lew-Port for her entire school career. She, along with her two siblings and three children, graduated from there. She readily dismissed the health concerns.

“I’ve heard it for years, but I don’t buy into it,” Hastings said, “because I don’t know that many unhealthy people.”

Lewiston-Porter High School senior Matt Janik said the community has the right to know the truth.

“There’s probably something there,” he said. “People need to take tests, get the proper results and show the community everything they found.”

John Long, who owns 61 acres of land on the former LOOW site, now operates a walleye hatchery on the premises.

As a kid, he used to live on Balmer Road, and remembers a high incidence of cancer in residents on the nearby Parker Road. He and his friends used to take their .22-caliber guns and shoot rats on the old LOOW site in his younger days.

His farm was downwind from the dump site, but neither he nor his family ever got sick, Long said. “There’s no reason for me to suspect anything.”

Bruce Pryce graduated from Lew-Port in the mid-1970s, and remembers his neighbors dying from leukemia.

“Back then we all knew the stuff was there, but it wasn’t as publicized,” said Pryce, who used to hunt deer in the area eat his kill.

“But I’m sure it takes 30 to 40 years for that (cancer) stuff to show up,” he said.

Didi Mead had two boys attend Lew-Port. She also realizes the time it takes for comprehensive studies to be done and to connect cancer with a source.

“That, unfortunately, is very hard to prove,” Mead said.

But when she really sat down and thought about what could be happening, Mead said she had a big reality check.

As far as the continuing burden of the area taking in so much hazardous waste, enough is enough.

“I just think we’ve had our fair share,” Mead said.

Meanwhile, the years of rumors and reports of elevated levels of cancer and death have left current students wondering what’s still being kept a secret.

“I definitely think things are being covered up,” said Lewiston-Porter senior Matt Janik.

Some students, like 2005 graduate Matt Agnello, believe that the towns and school district are afraid to dig deep into the mystery because it would result in less financial contributions and gifts from companies like Chemical Waste Management.

“Companies are trying to buy them out by giving money, but we’re the ones who are paying,” Agnello said. “I definitely think the chances of me getting cancer are higher because I went to school in Lewiston-Porter.”

Contact Rick Forgione at (716) 282-2311, Ext. 2257.



--------------------
Opening Pandora’s box


http://www.niagara-gazette.com/print_story.asp?id=2404


By Aaron Besecker
Monday, July 25, 2005

PORTER — As workers wheeled three sets of radiation detection instruments around CWM Chemical Services property last week, Richard Sturges saw progress.

A lengthy struggle embroiled here on part of the site known as the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works, and has sparked up over the past few years.

At issue is whether CWM’s hazardous waste operations at the site — a former federal dumping ground for materials from the Manhattan Project — might be disturbing buried materials and perpetuating health risks.

For Sturges, CWM’s district manager at its Model City site, the testing represents the latest step in the search for answers — answers he believes will help put the concerns to rest and give comfort to concerned citizens in the community.

“The company is committed to working with the community and providing the information necessary to show the facility, first, is safe, properly managed and in compliance with federal, state and local regulations,” Sturges said.

He also mentioned the company’s obligation to protect the health and safety of its workforce as a priority.

CWM, a subsidiary of national waste giant Waste Management, began operations on 710 acres of land in Porter in 1988. On a daily basis, shipments of various kinds of hazardous and industrial non-hazardous waste containing contaminants such as PCBs, metals, acids, waste oils and other materials arrive for treatment and disposal.

But for critics, the real danger arrived long before CWM showed up.

“The major concern is that land was previously contaminated during WWII operations and the period afterwards when it was used as a storage area for government radiological waste,” said Vincent Agnello, president of Residents for Responsible Government.

RRG formed in late-2001 after Town of Porter officials amended zoning laws allowing CWM to expand. Citing a lack of local leadership, Agnello said his group provides information and “a community-generated response for our leaders to follow.”

Members of RRG want a moratorium on all activity at the CWM site until all safety issues are addressed. “If that means shutting them down it means shutting them down,” Agnello said.

Sturges believes the $100 million spent on environmental upgrades to the facility since 1984 indicate the company is acting responsibly toward concerns.

One project, with a total cost of about $40 million, involved the securing of an area known as the “Lagoons and Salts.” Areas where soil and groundwater contamination were found were treated and capped to prevent further problems.

Add to that work the newly implemented radiological site scan — of which 50 acres of scanning has already been completed with nothing above background contamination found — and Sturges believes the scientific expertise will provide real answers soon.

“This is not a helter skelter thing,” Sturges said. “We’re gathering very valuable data.”

Officials at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the agency in charge of the LOOW cleanup, did not return calls for comment for this story.

The fact that CWM sits on the LOOW site complicates the situation, said Sean Q. Kelly, Niagara University professor and chair of the U.S. Army Corps’ Restoration Advisory Board.

“That’s what makes it difficult,” Kelly said. “The issues become intertwined with one another.”

Sturges called for critics to be reasonable and to put issues in proper perspective.

On the other hand, Agnello said today’s problems could have been prevented if planners thought about what they were doing.

“To build a school next to a radiological deposit makes absolutely no sense whatsoever,” Agnello said. “And then to put a landfill next to the school was totally insane.”

No CWM official would ever be able to convince him that radium and plutonium — two radiological substances found on the site — are safe, Agnello added.

He also responded strongly to Sturges’ call for critics to be reasonable.

“The property immediately adjacent to CWM is available,” Agnello said. “Maybe Dick Sturges should purchase it and build his mansion there if he thinks it’s so safe instead of living outside of Niagara County.”

Contact Aaron Besecker at (716) 282-2311, Ext. 2263.
©2004 The Kokomo Tribune



-- Edited by NuclearLou at 13:53, 2005-07-25

__________________
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all." Helen Keller "...and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us..."


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 469
Date:
RE: LOOW Ordnance site and schools, or, Pu & You
Permalink Closed


To all: I wasn't able to stem the tide of the weekend happenings on another thread and have placed these stories here on a new one. I was hopeful that all the background chatter and disagreeable diatribes could be avoided here until the series runs it's course on Thursday. At that time I hope to begin making comment about these articles and the ramifications of what they are saying. I would invite everyone to join in at that time. I just thought it would be a good idea to seperate the articles from the comments (for now), post them consecutively and in one spot so that any new readers--or newbies to the subject matter would have them all together.


That's my request and thanks. Sorry for any confusion. Best regards, Lou Ricciuti



__________________
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all." Helen Keller "...and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us..."


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 469
Date:
RE: Buried Secrets--LOOW Ordnance site and schools or, Pu & You
Permalink Closed


BURIED SECRETS a Niagara Gazette series, Day Three


http://www.niagara-gazette.com/print_story.asp?id=2407

Too close for comfort

By Rick Forgione
Tuesday, July 26, 2005

LEWISTON-PORTER — Twenty-one-year-old Breanne Sterner bravely walked up to Ralph Nader and asked him “do you think I look pretty?”

When he said yes, Sterner tore off her wig exposing her bald head — a side effect from chemotherapy to treat her cancer, which she believes is a result of going to school in the Lewiston-Porter School District.

And just like that, Sterner sent a message that no longer will people be able to keep the lid on the possible dangers of a school campus and community living next to one of the worst radioactive waste sites in America.

“If it helps make people realize something really needs to be done, that’s really what I care about,” Sterner said about exposing her illness to Nader during his visit to Lewiston in April. “My mom and I wanted to talk to him and let him know what was really going on.”

Lewiston-Porter’s Creek Road school campus sits on what’s considered the buffer zone of the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works, the site of federal government activity during the 1940s, including the storage of radioactive waste.

Also nearby is Chemical Waste Management, home to the Northeast’s only hazardous waste storage site.

In December, Sterner was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, a type of blood cancer. She’s spent the past seven months undergoing chemotherapy treatments.

“We feel the environment has a lot to do with my illness,” said Sterner, who had no prior health problems. “I never even had a cavity before.”

She isn’t the only one who believes what’s buried on the old LOOW site is making people sick. Local environment researchers, like Lou Ricciuti, have spent the last several years warning about the health hazards of working or going to school in Lewiston-Porter.

A group of residents have been conducting an unofficial study of the number of Lew-Port teacher deaths by sifting through old obituaries. Ricciuti said the search showed more than 60 teachers have died over the past 30 years, an average of 2.2 a year.

“The majority of the teachers who died were below the average life expectancy rate,” Ricciuti said, adding it’s impossible to track the number of student illnesses and deaths because of confidentiality clauses. “There’s definitely a problem.”

The Niagara County Health Department has not collected specific data on cancer and death rates involving Lew-Port students and teachers.

Lewiston-Porter Interim Superintendent Don Rappold said counting obituaries doesn’t confirm the deaths were a result of the environment.

“There could be plenty of other reasons such as family history of illness, whether they were smokers or even other factors in the community,” he said. “I know the teachers in this district better than anyone up here, I hired most of them, and I don’t see anything unusual.”

Rappold added that he’s worked in the district for 18 years and doesn’t suffer from any health problems.

The school district has a health and safety committee made up of parents, school staff, students and other health and education officials that meets about twice a year.

Beth Truax, executive vice president of the Lewiston-Porter United Teachers Union, said the committee always deals with any concerns or problems from the teachers right away. Union leaders have also collected anecdotal data on teacher cancer and death rates, she added.

“We have found nothing of significance to indicate a health hazard at this time,” Truax said.

That doesn’t mean every teacher is convinced they’re working in a safe environment.

“There are some who have varying levels of concerns given the district’s location,” Truax said. “We are always concerned about the health and welfare of our members.”

William Spry, who holds a Ph.D. in nuclear physics, took a large interest in the environmental concerns while he was a member of the Lew-Port School Board. While he agrees the fear is tremendous — especially over the discovery of plutonium found on the LOOW site — he believes the health concerns have been over exaggerated.

“That site has gotten many different complaints about it mainly because of the secrecy,” Spry said. “It is not unsafe to live next to.”

Spry compared the chances of getting sick from the environment to the chance of dying in a car crash while driving to Youngstown. He does concede, however, there appears to be a higher level of cancer among Lewiston and Porter residents than other areas in the state.

“Statistics are strange things,” he said, adding too many people are trying to create a chaos theory in Lew-Port. “It’s politics working the game.”

Try telling that to Lew-Port students, like Sterner, who are now battling life-threatening illnesses. She remembers going behind the school buildings and into the backwoods area for “Project Adventure” as part of their required physical education class.

Consisting of an obstacle course with ropes and boards, “Project Adventure” tested students on their ability to get across a small pond. Often times, students would fall into the mud or water — all within a stone’s throw of the LOOW site.

That physical education “activity” was stopped a few years ago.

Class of 1999 graduate Nick Baio was among those students who got dirty during Project Adventure. He remembers how students used to tell jokes about Lew-Port, saying how it was built on a toxic waste dump.

Baio is no longer laughing; neither are his classmates, one of which was diagnosed with cancer and a few others battling other unusual illnesses.

“I don’t really like to think about it, I guess,” Baio answered when asked if he’s worried his years as a Lew-Port student may affect his health. “But it’s always in the back of your mind.”

Baio said a lot of students used to go back to the LOOW site to party. The district’s cross country runners went through the area during practices.

Sterner, who was a cheerleader, now looks back at all of the nights she spent at the football stadium behind the schools and asks herself if things would be different if she had attended school somewhere else.

Her illness hasn’t stopped her from living her life. She has become a professional cheerleader and is ready to focus her energies on spreading the word of the environmental dangers of Lewiston and Porter.

“The main thing is me getting better first,” she said. “Once that happens, we’re going to start to get really involved.”


------------------------------------------------

Connecting the dots

http://www.niagara-gazette.com/print_story.asp?id=2409


By Aaron Besecker
Tuesday, July 26, 2005

LEWISTON — First it was her neighbors from childhood. Then numerous family members. Back cancer, blood disorders, sickness at early ages — strange diseases that never made any sense.

Throughout her life, Jenny Banas has known the impact of cancer. She’s seen it in the faces of people living around Lewiston-Porter and the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works — their fates tied together by a killer.

“It’s endless,” said Banas, of the list of friends, acquaintances, neighbors who’ve fallen from the disease.

But the list goes farther, deeper into the past where memories linger of dying loved ones stricken with a horrible illness.

Banas, who used to live in the area but now resides in Wolcott in Wayne County, believes the sicknesses can be connected to the history of chemical and radiological contamination at LOOW. She blames leaders for putting the Lew-Port schools so close to the dump.

But all the belief and anecdotal evidence in the world can only go so far.

Scientists, cancer experts and health officials have not found any data to link the toxic pollutants from the site with illnesses in residents.

It’s tricky business to make such a connection, said Richard Harvey, chief radiation expert at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo.

As the radiation safety officer at one of the country’s top hospitals, Harvey knows the ins and outs of radiation. From his perspective, a lack of data makes it difficult to definitively say the LOOW site is causing cancer in nearby residents.

“It’s hard to say unless you know everything,” Harvey said. And at this point, officials don’t.

The likelihood for an individual to get cancer depends on a lot of things, according to Harvey. Lifestyle, genetics and exposure to environmental contaminants differ for each person.

And the type of cancer that may result from exposure differs based on what type of material winds up inside the body. Certain materials affect the lymph nodes, or the blood or the stomach.

The most likely way people in and around the LOOW site could be exposed is through ingesting materials in contaminated drinking water. The chance that people who live downwind could be exposed through radiation spread through the air — in a process known as re-suspension — is less likely because the process is inefficient, Harvey said.

Much the same for people who live farther downstream if the material is in a water source. By the time the substance reached that person, it would be diluted.

Movement of radioactive materials in contaminated soils through groundwater is possible, but again, dilution occurs and the risk decreases.

“The more radiation that gets delivered, the more likely it would cause biological effect,” Harvey said.

The people most at risk around the LOOW site are workers, who are closest to the source of radiation and likely to receive the biggest dose of radiation.

In order to assuage residents concerned about migration of substances off the LOOW and CWM site, Harvey suggested creating a perimeter of monitoring. Such testing could then provide data to assess risk for students and staff at Lewiston-Porter schools.

For Banas, who went to Lew-Port and thinks the schools need to be moved, the message about past contamination has been on the wall since she took classes on Creek Road.

“Everybody knew,” Banas said. “Nobody did anything.”

On a larger scale, officials say the evidence just isn’t there.

“Statistically, we don’t have any cancer statistics that are greater than anywhere in Western New York,” said Niagara County Public Health Director Paulette Kline.

Locally, cancer rates are related to the area’s history of industrial pollution, Kline added.

State health officials have planned a cancer study for the Lewiston-Porter district. The design of the study has been completed, and will take around two years to complete, according to Kline.

A spokesman for the state Department of Health, Jeffrey Hammond, said Niagara County has never been reported to the Center for Disease Control under the suspicion it might have any “clusters,” or high rates of cancer.

Another DOH spokesman, Robert Kenny, said there are multiple factors that contribute to cancer incidence. He declined to comment on the possible connection between sickness and the LOOW site.

Kline — who said the county’s well-water testing program is progressing and stressed she doesn’t want to cause any undue alarm in the public — believes many in the public are eager to link the LOOW site with rates.

“Most people that suffer from that devastating illness want to know the cause,” Kline said.


 Copyright 2005



__________________
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all." Helen Keller "...and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us..."


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 469
Date:
RE: Buried Secrets--LOOW Ordnance site and schools or, Pu & You
Permalink Closed


BURIED SECRETS, a Niagara Gazette special series, by Rick Forgione and Aaron Besecker, DAY FOUR

Questions remain about the next step at Lew-Port

http://www.niagara-gazette.com/story.asp?id=2413

BY RICK FORGIONE
Wednesday, July 27, 2005

LEWISTON-PORTER — Don Rappold has seen it all during his 18 years with the Lewiston-Porter School District.

Superintendents have been fired. Board of Education members waged verbal wars against each other. Many parents and students lost faith in the district’s leadership.

But one issue trumps the rest.

“There’s always been something with the environmental concerns here,” Rappold said. “It’s never been quiet.”

Here’s the facts: Lewiston-Porter’s campus at 4061 Creek Road sits on the buffer zone of the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works, the site of federal government activity during the 1940s, including the storage of radioactive waste. Down the road is Chemical Waste Management, the Northeast’s only hazardous waste storage site.

Rumors of contamination on the school campus have run rampant for years, prompting the district to begin soil testing. Many say the campus’ proximity to CWM alone puts them in a dangerous position if there’s a waste spill or other kind of accident.

The question is, as it has been for many years, what steps should Lewiston-Porter officials take to ensure the safety of their students and staff.

“If there’s a problem, we’ll take care of it,” said Rappold, who was recently appointed the district’s interim superintendent. “So far, we have done everything that’s been requested of us.”

Testing the limits

After conducting its own soil studies, the district sought a professional’s second opinion and contacted Joseph A. Gardella, Jr., professor of chemistry and associate dean of external affairs for the University at Buffalo. The team from UB searched the campus last year and detected an elevated level of arsenic behind the Community Resource Center on the north end. School officials believe it to be from the spraying of an old orchard located decades ago at the site, but that hasn’t been confirmed, Gardella said.

The district hired Pan-American Environmental of Buffalo to complete arsenic testing on 60 soil samples taken from the district’s grounds. That’s where things got a little problematic. Pan-American’s report came back claiming arsenic was no longer detected at the site.

“That was the fly in the ointment so to speak,” Gardella said.

He believes there was an inaccuracy made in the way Pan-American’s subcontractor analyzed the samples on the second look.

“There’s plenty of evidence there’s elevated arsenic on the site,” said Gardella, who has been the school district’s main consultant regarding the testing.

Gardella is suggesting the district have the samples re-tested before taking further action. The Board of Education has not discussed the matter in public since Pan-American’s report was released a few months ago.

“It’s hard to have a sense of what the school board will want to do,” Gardella said. “There has to be a resolution to this.”

Rappold said the district is considering the re-testing and possible remediation work if needed. He points out school officials opted for a professional opinion even after their own tests showed no major contamination on the site.

Still, some people feel that’s not enough.

Vincent Agnello, president for Residents for Responsible Government Inc., has sent letters to school leaders and spoken out during public meetings requesting more in-depth investigations, including testing the air and current students and teachers on campus. He also wants the district to begin a monitoring program for chemical and radiological contamination and to develop a disaster plan.

He points to a recent accident during which a truck carrying hazardous wastes traveling from a site in Massachusetts overturned on Creek Road at the corner of Balmer Road a few blocks from the school campus. The time of that accident was 7:35 a.m., but classes were in summer recess.

“Thankfully, school children were not traveling to school and thankfully no one was seriously injured including the driver,” Agnello said, adding it shows an accident can happen at any time. “It is proof that trucking hazardous wastes past a school is totally insane.”

The Niagara County Health Department also has expressed interest in additional testing be done at Lew-Port.

Rappold insists the district is willing to cooperate and call for additional testing, but feels some of the financial costs attached to such studies should be shared. Lew-Port has already spent $50,000 in the past two years searching for contamination on the campus. Agnello said RRG is in the process of exploring possible funding for the school district through grants.

To Move or Not to Move

While additional testing may be in the district’s future, one thing not currently being considered is moving the campus.

That’s something Gardella hopes will change. Because of the proximity to CWM and LOOW, he believes the district has to take proactive action to ensure the protection of students and staff.

“It’s a legitimate question to investigate,” Gardella said about relocating the campus. “The question is, with CWM, LOOW and the Niagara Falls Storage Site nearby, is that the kind of place you want the school close by? You have to think about the future.”

In 2002, a group of graduate students and professionals from the University at Buffalo made a recommendation to the Town of Porter that the school district be moved because of its proximity to CWM and LOOW. While Porter officials took to heart several of the group’s suggestions, they ignored the advice about moving the campus.

In addition, Lew-Port school officials claim they were never made aware of the recommendation. Rappold said there’s been talk about moving the campus to the Joseph Davis Park to take advantage of some possible money from the New York Power Authority, but it had nothing to do with health concerns.

Gardella said he doesn’t feel there’s a health risk at this time on the Lew-Port campus. He credited Rappold and other school officials for doing the initial testing.

“I think they’ve gone beyond due diligence,” Gardella said. “Mr. Rappold has been completely open and honest. He really wants to do the right thing.”

Staying on the surface

Whatever the next step is, it’s obvious the health concerns surrounding the district aren’t going to be buried anytime soon.

Gardella is in the process of working with the county health department to compile a data base of concise information regarding the history of the site and what tests and reports have been completed. He’s also dedicated to making sure everyone’s questions are treated fairly.

He concedes, however, that not everyone is going to be happy.

“There’s people out there looking for ghosts and goblins under every rock, and then you have other people saying there’s absolutely nothing wrong,” Gardella said.

Lew-Port graduate Charlene Lopacki is among the locals who will keep the issue in the spotlight. She ran for the Lewiston-Porter Board of Education this past May on a platform of environmental safety. Though she lost her bid for a seat, she doesn’t plan on going away.

“As long as I live here, I’m going to do whatever I can to get something done,” she said.

Contact Rick Forgione at (716) 282-2311, Ext. 2257
©2005
--------------------------------------------------
Many players lead to lack of responsibility

http://www.niagara-gazette.com/print_story.asp?id=2414

BY AARON BESECKER
Wednesday, July 27, 2005

PORTER — Sixty years have passed since radioactive waste was dumped here. More than 30 years have gone by since state health officials said don’t move the soil.

And even though numerous state and federal agencies held some segment of responsibility there, questions remain about just what’s buried on the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works and what officials today plan to do about it.

From the state-level Department of Environmental Conservation to the state Department of Health to federal agencies including the Department of Energy and Department of Defense, officials never coordinated their knowledge or a plan to deal with the contamination and potential health problems, critics said.

“They want to completely forget it because they’re the ones that messed it up in the first place,” said Lou Ricciuti, a local researcher, on the responsibility of federal officials.

Ricciuti, who has spent five years investigating the history of the LOOW site, said other levels of government also bear responsibility for what’s happened at the site, including the Niagara County and New York state health departments.

State health officials in 1972 and 1974 ordered no soil should be excavated on the site where CWM Chemical Services now operates — part of the former federal dumping ground called the LOOW.

Niagara County Public Health Director Paulette Kline, who took her position in late-2001, dismissed any responsibility on the part of the county for conditions at the LOOW.

“My feeling is that we never had jurisdiction over the site per se,” said Kline, who learned about the existence of the health order in 2003. “We never had any reason to believe the site wasn’t being monitored.”

As one of six public health directors at the county since the issuance of the state health order in 1972, Kline said there was a good chance “some people (in management) weren’t aware of it.”

“Gosh, it was a long time ago,” she said.

Kline added she wants to hold private companies accountable for ongoing monitoring of sites, and said more research could be done depending on the results of the well-testing program taking place this month.

The “Community LOOW Project” is also being undertaken by the county — decades after nuclear waste was buried here — and is designed to collect data about the site’s history.

Amy Witryol, co-founder of the Niagara Health Science Report, defended the county’s role in the current situation. The project “seems like a constructive concept to identify these gaps and to collaborate with all involved parties,” she said.

“A huge problem in cleaning up the LOOW is dozens of state and federal agency programs, each limited to certain parts of the site or specific kinds of contaminants,” Witryol later added.

A spokeswoman for the DEC, the agency with primary responsibility for permitting present landfill activity on the site, said it will continue to work with the property owners and the state Department of Health to remedy the site.

Environmental officials will also keep their eyes on CWM to protect public health and the environment, said Spokeswoman Maureen Wren.

“Since the DEC became involved as the permitting authority at CWM, the department has been committed to ensuring compliance with permit conditions and enforcing when that compliance was not reached,” Wren said. “We do that by performing regular inspections and through the environmental monitors.”

Officials at the state Department of Health did not return calls for comment.

Gary Abraham, Niagara County’s environmental attorney, said he was not sure which agency was most culpable, but did point to state health officials actions since the 1972 order was issued.

“They apparently didn’t enforce the order in the interim,” Abraham said.

One critic cited a lack of communication as the reason for the extent of today’s dangers.

“The big problem is none of these agencies ever talked to each other,” said Vince Agnello, president of Residents for Responsible Government. “Everybody’s pointing to somebody else.”

Contact Aaron Besecker at (716) 282-2311, Ext. 2263.
  ©2005


----------------------


Balmer Road School still raises questions

http://www.niagara-gazette.com/print_story.asp?id=2415

BY RICK FORGIONE
Wednesday, July 27, 2005

LEWISTON-PORTER — In September of 1967, a couple hundred third-graders were sent into the woods to attend a school that once housed military offices.

The facility, surrounded by a tall metal fence topped with barbed-wire, was located smack dab in the middle of one of the worst radioactive waste sites in the country.

While this may sound like a script for some Hollywood horror movie, for Janet Mitchell and her classmates, it was all too real.

“I just can’t believe they did that to us,” Mitchell said. “We were 9-year-old kids.”

Overcrowding in the centralized Lewiston-Porter School District in the late 1960s forced officials to come up with a temporary site to teach third-graders. After turning down the idea of installing portable classrooms on the Creek Road campus, the district decided to lease a building from Fort Conti Corp. of Buffalo.

The Balmer Road facility was located on the Lake Ontario Ordnance Works, the site for federal government activity during the 1940s, including the storage of radioactive waste. The district renovated the building into 11 classrooms and used a separate nearby building as the gymnasium and cafeteria. Classes were taught at the site until June 1970 after a new elementary school was opened at the Creek Road campus.

“Nobody thought anything about it back then,” said Mitchell, who attended the school from 1969 to 1970.

Nowadays, Mitchell worries a lot about spending time on that site. It’s bad enough, she said, that the current Lew-Port campus sits on the buffer zone of LOOW, but to actually send students on the site seems almost as if they were part of some experiment.

“That’s what we’re all thinking,” said Mitchell, adding the school was the main talk during her recent 25th High School class reunion. “There’s so many chemicals we went to school on.”

She doesn’t think it’s a coincidence that many of her female classmates at Balmer School have had miscarriages and given birth to children with special needs. So far, Mitchell and her two children have avoided any health problems.

“I feel like a ticking time bomb,” she said.

Students attending Balmer School drank water that came from an on-site well. Lunches also were prepared using that water.

“The water from the drinking fountain tasted horrible,” said Ellen McGuire-White, who also attended the school.

White moved to Texas after graduating from Lew-Port in 1978. She returns home every summer, but can’t bring herself to visit her old school campus.

“I wouldn’t be comfortable about sending my children there either,” she said.

Evelyn Buffone also attended third grade at Balmer Road. She and her classmates used to put their coats on and walk outside to get to the cafeteria and gym. At the time, she didn’t think anything was unusual about her surroundings.

“My dad was very upset that they were sending kids there,” Buffone said. “I never thought much about it, but I always wonder now.”

White said she’s heard of several Lew-Port students and teachers who have died as a result of exposure to the surrounding environment, but she thinks there’s a lot more still being kept secret.

“Nobody likes to talk about the high incidents of cancer out here,” she said.

Like it or not, the issue is going to remain on the front burner, Mitchell added.

“I’m not going to keep quiet about this,” Mitchell said. “Ignorance is the biggest disease out here.”

Contact Rick Forgione at (716) 282-2311, Ext. 2257
  ©2005



__________________
"Life is a daring adventure or nothing at all." Helen Keller "...and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us..."
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard