we need a lou vs mike forum

pcguy · Veteran Member

we need a lou vs mike forum

nuclearlou · Senior Member

PCGuy-Mr. Munn:
Look at the titles of the next forum threads here in 'Non-Sequitur.'

What WE need is to have this A$$hOle banned. Him and his scummy friendly-followers. I don't start this sh*t. They followed me here and elsewhere. They got my telephone and even called my home until I stopped answering it!

They're whacked in the heads. _Period. Don't you think there are enough threads with this garbage in them already? Besides PCGuy, this is Non Sequitur and EXACTLY WHY SL set this up in the first place...and, just the location to make these posts--AWAY from the main threads. It's called Non-Sequitur for a reason. No offense, but if you don't care for it, then avoid reading it and then why add pergoratives any more than are already being slung around. NO forum needs "squabble-accelerant." They're simply disturbed folks. Just don't read their BS.

Don't you like my informative posts? Seems like almost everyone else is concerned and interested. Heck, I even asnwered one of your questions about food/farmland contamination some time ago. NEVER heard a single word or a thanks-back from you-do you recall ['Dare I Eat A Peach']?

Did you like his most recent post on the main forum? And the others about killing "brown babies" and "letting the rats eat them?" I don't care WHAT YOUR POLITICAL VIEWS ARE, that's just whacked, sick and anti-life!
There's not one KID ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD that deserves to die in warfare. Not ONE F^(&*& CHILD! This guy and his whole family are full of pus and hate. They have putrified or have a very seriously malicious agenda. Plain and simple.

How's the weather down there and I hope the scrunchie business is flourishing for you.

Have Good Cheer,
NL--(The Cyber-Stalked and Internet Harassed)

-- Edited by nuclearlou at 19:09, 2006-08-08

pcguy · Veteran Member

I highly encourage you to take a calm breath and relax for a few moments. This always helps to gather your thoughts and express them. I don't really have an agenda, it was simply a point to be made. You will notice that I have never addressed you in a hostile or mean fashion, to do so would be childish.

You will find a more receptive audience if you stop and think, and write a clear and concise answer or retort to someone you don't agree with. I have read a few of your posts and agree with you on many of the arguments, but what I don't agree with is the style with which you do so.

While your knowledge and expertise may indeed be impeccable, you style and mannerisms are holding you back more than you realize. Most people on internet forums would never read such long and disorganized posts, filled with vitriole and hate.

Think about the most powerful political people you know, how did they get that way? They wield power swiftly and purposefully. Develop some panache, and learn how to persuade the unwilling. This will allow you to accomplish far more than you realize.

All the banter might make you feel better in the short term, but does nothing for your overall goals. I mean this sincerely, don't take it the wrong way.

nuclearlou · Senior Member

Thank you for your opinions Mr. Munn.

I also thank you for your compliment. You are welcome for my previous reply to you offline many months ago answering your question about foodstuffs and farmland contamination.

I feel that I have been dogged, trolled, baited and harassed here and elsewhere on other forums. If you see this differently, that's your choice. If my posts seem disorganized to you, I apologize. I think they are quite concise, meaningful and I do the best that I can with them.

The responses you may not care for are those associated with the harassment, trolling, baiting and the like. I'm sure. You may also wish to address those folks in specific. But, that's just my opinion.

Since this is the 'Non-Sequitur' area of the forum, where would you suggest that I have these "discussions" and how would you suggest I deal with the longstanding trolls: SueH, MoTm, Dovey, JH, 'nukedlou' and the others? Recently, one of the above good-folks mentioned made a post to another forum "culled" from here, then signed MY NAME to this cut and paste. I'd sure appreciate any of your advice or wisdom on how to deal with those folks.

Feel free to do some searching here on this site for any of the associated names mentioned or their posts. You might be surprised. I do find it interesting that they are not the topic of your vitriol (no offense meant). Mine, I feel is warranted at them. Your's on the other hand, came from out of no-where, was very directed and is just quite curious, all things considered. As mentioned before, I simply don't think that "troll-accelerant" is needed here or on any forum and certainly an additional thread here was not called for unless as an inflammatory.

Are you offering any sort of help--besides the well-intentioned advice?

Can you send some money $ for the cause, the advancement of science or this research? (Please, send to Scott at this address c/o IERO, Inc.).

Have good cheer, Lou R.

NuclearLou, Niagara-Lewiston, New York--"Los Alamos East"

-- Edited by nuclearlou at 23:01, 2006-08-14

pcguy · Veteran Member

Lou,

My post wasn't meant as a troll or accelerant. I was merely pointing out what I thought was an opportunity to put a better set of tools in your hands. Words can be powerful things when applied correctly. I simply directed it at you since you seem to show the most potential from those involved in the skirmishes and would benefit most from a new tactic.

What I can't help with is what has transpired to this point. But I think you get the gist of it. If you approach things in a persistent yet measured fashion, you will outlast them and prevail in the end. Especially when things are out in the public eye. There is no better way to turn the table on politicians when it's done in full light of the media, and the citizen involved is quite clear minded and easily accepted by the public at large. Using documentation and facts that can't be twisted about will bolster the fight. The trick here is to genuinely be interested in making sure the right thing is done. Being pure in purpose is the only way.

One of the things I find interesting about the forum wars is the tactics used tend to loose sight of the war and focus on each skirmish. I see a lot of points made with force that are really irrelevant to the main battle points. It does no one any good. Simply pointing out facts or using a real name or other tidbit of public information just comes across as a cheap shot. Anyone can throw facts or information out there, but the winner is one whom organizes that information and presents it in a fashion anyone can understand and agree with.

mike of the mountain · Senior Member

nuclearlou wrote:

Thank you for your opinions Mr. Munn.

I also thank you for your compliment. You are welcome for my previous reply to you offline many months ago answering your question about foodstuffs and farmland contamination.

I feel that I have been dogged, trolled, baited and harassed here and elsewhere on other forums. If you see this differently, that's your choice. If my posts seem disorganized to you, I apologize. I think they are quite concise, meaningful and I do the best that I can with them.

The responses you may not care for are those associated with the harassment, trolling, baiting and the like. I'm sure. You may also wish to address those folks in specific. But, that's just my opinion.

Since this is the 'Non-Sequitur' area of the forum, where would you suggest that I have these "discussions" and how would you suggest I deal with the longstanding trolls: SueH, MoTm, Dovey, JH, 'nukedlou' and the others? Recently, one of the above good-folks mentioned made a post to another forum "culled" from here, then signed MY NAME to this cut and paste. I'd sure appreciate any of your advice or wisdom on how to deal with those folks.

Feel free to do some searching here on this site for any of the associated names mentioned or their posts. You might be surprised. I do find it interesting that they are not the topic of your vitriol (no offense meant). Mine, I feel is warranted at them. Your's on the other hand, came from out of no-where, was very directed and is just quite curious, all things considered. As mentioned before, I simply don't think that "troll-accelerant" is needed here or on any forum and certainly an additional thread here was not called for unless as an inflammatory.

Are you offering any sort of help--besides the well-intentioned advice?

Can you send some money $ for the cause, the advancement of science or this research? (Please, send to Scott at this address c/o IERO, Inc.).

Have good cheer, Lou R.

NuclearLou, Niagara-Lewiston, New York--"Los Alamos East"

-- Edited by nuclearlou at 23:01, 2006-08-14

Can you send some money $ for the cause, the advancement of science or this research? (Please, send to Scott at this address c/o IERO, Inc.).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HMMM,

the above quote from Nuclear Lou Looks like an attempt to solicit funds for an alleged incorperation that does not even exist .... [IERO,inc] . to what end would these funds be used i wonder .. ?

Nuclear Lou has always been full of pooh , but here is something from his past previously overlooked ....just because we overlooked it in the past , that does not make this a legitimate or legal solicitation .